Link profile audit
A full read of what you have, what is doing work, what is dead weight and what is actively risky. You get the audit whether or not you go on to buy placements.
Manual outreach, vetted publishers and a report you can hand straight to a client.
We work with a shortlist of publishers rather than a marketplace. That means we say no to a lot of requests, and it means the sites we do work with keep their standards intact. A link only matters if the page around it matters, so the page around it is where we spend our attention.
A full read of what you have, what is doing work, what is dead weight and what is actively risky. You get the audit whether or not you go on to buy placements.
Before anything is placed we map what your profile already looks like and where it is lopsided. The plan then fills the gaps rather than piling more of the same anchors on top.
Publishers in Polish, Ukrainian, German and Spanish, approached in their own language by people who speak it. Translated outreach reads as translated outreach and gets ignored.
Longer campaigns built around something worth writing about — original data, a strong opinion, a tool. Slower to start, but the coverage tends to keep arriving after the campaign ends.
We pitch a genuine article idea to the publisher, write it to their standard, and place your link inside the body where it supports the argument. No author boxes, no sidebar dumping.
We pull the profiles of the sites beating you, strip out the noise, and show you the publishers that link to several of them and not to you. That list is usually the fastest route forward.
Reports are written on the assumption that somebody sceptical will read them. Every placement carries the live URL, the anchor used, the target page, the publication date and a short note explaining why that publisher was on the list in the first place.
If a placement did not happen, the report says which one and why. Campaigns that only ever report successes are hiding the interesting part.
Alongside new placements, each report lists everything we re-checked from previous cycles and its current state. Links that disappeared appear in the report as clearly as links that went live.
The team is small on purpose. Every publisher relationship is held by a person rather than a database, and there is a hard limit on how many of those relationships one person can maintain honestly. That limit is what caps our capacity.
This began as an internal tool for a small group of site owners who were tired of buying links and then auditing them afterwards. Most of the rules on this page exist because at some point we broke one of them and had to clean up after ourselves.
Below is roughly where the current publisher base sits. It shifts every quarter as sites are added and, more often, quietly dropped.
For anyone who wants the reasoning rather than the pitch, most of it has been written up over at:
Send the URL you want to rank and the keywords you keep losing on. We will come back with an honest read on whether links are your bottleneck, which they are not always.